not in the 21st century even be thinking about going...A PART OF THEIR PLATFORM IS GOING TO BE DEMANDING 'RIGHTS FOR PROPERTY FOR THE 'UNBORN'...THUS MEANING THE FEMALE IS LIKE THAT OF THE SLAVE TO NOW BE DEEMED AS 'PROPERTY'?!?
THE MALE AT THE CONVENTION WHO CHRIST MATTHEWIS INTERVIEW BROUGHT UP THIS 'RIGHT OF PROPERTY FOR THE UNBORN' AS BEING IN THEIR PLATFORM USED TALKING POINTS OF ROMENY WILL NOT BE IN AGREEEMENT WITH ALL IN THE PLATFORM...BUT THE FEMALE WENT INTO DETAILS OF THE CONSTITUTION SAYS ABOUT THE RIGHTS TO THIS (YOU HAVE GOT TO SEE THIS TO BE ABLE TO BELIEVE SOMETHING LIKETHIS AS ACTUALLY GOING ON IN OUR NATION, TODAY!!!!
NOW AS ALWAYS WHEN WE GO ON EMOTION, WE TEND TO OVERLOOK THE OBJECTIVITY OF THE LAWS OF THE CONSTITUTION...EXAMPLE, DISCRMINATION IS ILLEGAL IN AMERICA THAT IS UNLESS THE MALE'S BODY CAN BE 'PROPERTY OF THE UNBORN AS WELL, WE CAN NOT SINGLE OUT THE FEMALE TO TAKE AWAY HER INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS GIVEN BY AS THEY LIKE TO SAY, BY GOD AS IN HER HAVING A BRAIN...FREEDOMS OF : SPEECH, PRIVACY, THOUGHTS...
AND, PLEASE LET US NOT GO BACK TO DECLARING ANYONE AS 'PROPERTY ' EVER AGAIN IN OUR NATION, PLEASE!!! (N...U...P)
Posted By: ROBINSON IRMA
Tuesday, August 28th 2012 at 6:32PM
You can also
click
here to view all posts by this author...
